Tigerism Sun Wukong VS Softears RSV

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

Tigerism Sun Wukong and Softears RSV use 1DD and 5BA driver setups respectively. Tigerism Sun Wukong costs $650 while Softears RSV costs $730. Softears RSV is $80 more expensive. Softears RSV holds a clear 0.5-point edge in reviewer scores (6.9 vs 7.4). Softears RSV carries a user score of 7. Softears RSV has slightly better bass with a 0.3-point edge, Softears RSV has significantly better mids with a 3.4-point edge, Softears RSV has significantly better treble with a 4.7-point edge, Softears RSV has significantly better soundstage with a 3.5-point edge, Softears RSV has better details with a 0.7-point edge and Softears RSV has significantly better imaging with a 1.2-point edge.

Insights

Metric Tigerism Sun Wukong Softears RSV
Bass 6.5 6.8
Mids 5 8.4
Treble 3 7.7
Details 5.5 6.2
Soundstage 4 7.5
Imaging 5 6.2
Dynamics 6.9 5.5
Gaming capabilities 5.6 6.7

Tigerism Sun Wukong Aggregated Review Score

Tigerism Sun Wukong Average Reviewer Scores

Shuwa-T
IEMRanking AI
Z-Reviews

Average Reviewer Score:

6.9

Cautiously Favorable


Softears RSV Aggregated Review Score

Softears RSV Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision Nymz
Tim Tuned Gizaudio Axel Crin Shuwa-T
Super* Review Jays Audio Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

7.4

Generally Favorable


Tigerism Sun Wukong User Review Score

Tigerism Sun Wukong Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Softears RSV User Review Score

Softears RSV Average User Scores

Average User Score:

Based on 1 user reviews

7

Generally Favorable

Tigerism Sun Wukong Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.6

Gaming Grade

B-

Softears RSV Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.7

Gaming Grade

B+

Tigerism Sun Wukong Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

B-
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass B+
Good bass foundation with decent impact. Maintains acceptable control while providing satisfying thump in most tracks.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble D
Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.
Soundstage C-
Average soundstage - adequate width but flat presentation. Reasonable instrument separation but lacks layering and depth.
Details B-
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Softears RSV Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Well-executed tonal character. No major flaws with good technical control. Smooth presentation works with multiple genres.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • Competent technical presentation. Handles separation and detail well in most tracks, with modest soundstage and acceptable imaging capabilities.
Bass B+
Good bass foundation with decent impact. Maintains acceptable control while providing satisfying thump in most tracks.
Mids A+
Superb midrange that's rich and resolving. Exceptional transparency and micro-details with perfect vocal/instrument balance.
Treble A
Excellent treble: airy, extended and well-controlled. Great micro-detail retrieval without sibilance or harshness.
Dynamics B-
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage A
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Details B
Good resolution with clear articulation of nuances. Reveals recording nuances and maintains clarity in complex passages.
Imaging B
Good imaging with precise instrument placement. Clear localization within the soundstage including front/back positioning.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Tigerism Sun Wukong Reviews

Tigerism Sun Wukong reviewed by:

Z-Reviews 8.5 * score normalized
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Tigerism Sun Wukong or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $423

Buy Tigerism Sun Wukong on Linsoul

Tigerism Sun Wukong reviewed by:

Shuwa-T 4.8 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C Tech
Sounds nothing like the DM despite being marketed as a bassier version. Lacks any sort treble bite, with all instruments requiring higher frequencies sounding muffled.

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

- Shuwa-T
Bass: B+ Mids: C+ Treble: D Soundstage: C- Details: B- Imaging: C+

Tigerism Sun Wukong reviewed by:

2025-07-19
IEMRanking AI 7.5 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A- Tech

The Tigerism Sun Wukong features an all-metal build with a striking Monkey King illustration, feeling durable but somewhat chunky. Its short nozzle and weight can lead to inconsistent fit and isolation, varying significantly between users. Accessories are minimal for the price, including only a cable, two tip types, a case, and a pouch .

Sound-wise, the 14.2mm dynamic driver delivers a deep, expansive bass with controlled sub-bass focus and textured mid-bass, avoiding bleed into the mids. The midrange offers clarity, with warm lower mids and slightly forward female vocals, though male vocals exhibit a noticeable dip. Treble suffers from unevenness and reduced decay, limiting detail retrieval and contributing to an average soundstage despite good separation .

Buy Tigerism Sun Wukong on Linsoul (affiliate)

- IEMRanking AI

Softears RSV Reviews

Softears RSV reviewed by:

Super* Review 8* * score normalized
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Softears RSV or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $729.99

Buy Softears RSV on Hifigo

Softears RSV reviewed by:

Jays Audio 8.5 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
A+ Tech
One of the best vocals I've heard on any IEM (especially for male artists). Mids and Treble is TOTL, smooth and well extended and has great naturalness and the perfect bite. Bass has great speed and still slams (even though it's BA? not rumbly), but stage and detail is average at it's price, but once it clicks with a track it's one of the most beautiful thing ever. Ran into distortion issues at high volume, but may be due to my source? (RSV too sensitive?)

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel
- Jays Audio

Softears RSV reviewed by:

Precogvision 6.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
B Tech
Well-tuned from top-to-bottom with good timbre. Safe to the point of boredom.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
- Precogvision
Bass: B Mids: S Treble: A+ Dynamics: B Details: B Imaging: B

Softears RSV reviewed by:

Tim Tuned 7 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A- Tech
Timbre so beautiful you think it's not a BA set

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
- Tim Tuned
Bass: A+ Mids: S Treble: A+

Softears RSV reviewed by:

Gizaudio Axel 7.5 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A Tech
I prefer the Studio 4. Warmer, bassier, and slightly more resolving than the Studio 4, with great timbre. BA Bass.

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel
- Gizaudio Axel

Softears RSV reviewed by:

Jaytiss 8.3 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A+ Tech
Great upper treble, but its overall tonality isn't perfect.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
- Jaytiss
Mids: A+ Treble: A+ Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: A+

Softears RSV reviewed by:

Crin 7.5 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
A- Tech
Very well-balanced tonality with surprisingly good timbre, though slightly lacking definition.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel
- Crin

Softears RSV reviewed by:

Shuwa-T 7.4 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A- Tech
Mid and vocal centric set, this is not reference tuning despite the name

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

- Shuwa-T
Bass: A- Mids: A+ Treble: A Soundstage: A- Details: A Imaging: A

Softears RSV reviewed by:

Nymz 6.3 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
C+ Tech
A BA set that almost sounds like a DD. Needs low OI source. Bass close to U12T with more mid-bass impact. Great treble. Sub-bass and imaging can be lacking for some. My favourite vocals ever.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

- Nymz
Bass: B Mids: A+ Treble: A- Details: C+ Imaging: C+

Tigerism Sun Wukong User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Softears RSV User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
Makavelian 2025-06-16 04:46:45
7

Solid pick at used prices for those wanting a neutral sound with hint of sub-bass oomph.

Pros
Excellent balanced, all rounder sound signature with natural tonality, vocal reproduction is particularly pleasing.
Cons
Hint of darkness in upper registers affecting overall sense of resolution, bass texture could be better.

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer