ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra VS TinHifi T2 Evo

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra and TinHifi T2 Evo are in-ear monitors. ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra costs $43 while TinHifi T2 Evo costs $50. TinHifi T2 Evo is $7 more expensive. ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra holds a decisive 2.8-point edge in reviewer scores (5.8 vs 3). ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra has significantly better mids with a 2-point edge, ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra has significantly better treble with a 3-point edge and ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra has significantly better dynamics with a 3-point edge.

Insights

Metric ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra TinHifi T2 Evo
Bass 5.8 3
Mids 5 3
Treble 5 2
Details 5.8 4
Soundstage 6 3
Imaging 5.8 3
Dynamics 6 3
Tonality 5 2.7
Technicalities 5 3.3

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Z-Reviews
Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

5.8

Mixed


TinHifi T2 Evo Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision

Average Reviewer Score:

3

Very Poor


Reviews Comparison

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra (more reviews)

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 6 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech
Great details and bass, so fun.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: B Soundstage: B

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 5.5 * score normalized

TinHifi T2 Evo (more reviews)

TinHifi T2 Evo reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 3 Reviewer Score
D- Tuning
D Tech
Tinny and way too much head-voice from singers. See you all next month for the next iteration of this dying IEM.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: D Mids: D Treble: E+ Dynamics: D Details: C- Imaging: D

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

TinHifi T2 Evo User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5

Gaming Grade

C+

TinHifi T2 Evo Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.1

Gaming Grade

D

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics B
Good dynamic expression with solid impact. Handles volume contrasts well while maintaining good transient snap.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

TinHifi T2 Evo Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D-
  • Tonally jarring or fatiguing. Frequency clashes (e.g., piercing treble, bloated bass) make extended listening unpleasant. Poor genre adaptation.

Average Technical Grade

D
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass D
Bass is light and underwhelming. While some faint rumble exists, it lacks punch and authority in any meaningful way.
Mids D
Midrange is significantly uneven with coloration. Some frequencies are boosted while others are missing, creating an unnatural tone.
Treble E+
Treble is noticeably dark and lacking extension. Cymbals lack shimmer and high-frequency details are obscured.
Dynamics D
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Details C-
Average resolution - reveals basic elements but misses subtleties. Satisfactory for casual listening but lacks refinement.
Imaging D
Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning. Lacks precision for center placement and suffers from positional blurring.
Gaming D
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

TinHifi T2 Evo User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Buy

Footer