Tipsy Spica 260 and BQEYZ Winter use 2DD BA and 1DD+1BC driver setups respectively. Tipsy Spica 260 costs $206 while BQEYZ Winter costs $239. BQEYZ Winter is $33 more expensive. BQEYZ Winter holds a decisive 2.1-point edge in reviewer scores (4.9 vs 7).
Insights
Metric | Tipsy Spica 260 | BQEYZ Winter |
---|---|---|
Mids | 5 | 7 |
Treble | 3 | 7 |
Soundstage | 6 | 7 |
Dynamics | 5 | 7 |
Tonality | 4.4 | 7.9 |
Technicalities | 4.5 | 7.6 |
Tipsy Spica 260 Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
BQEYZ Winter Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
Tipsy Spica 260 Details
Driver Configuration: 2DD BA
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $206
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
BQEYZ Winter Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD+1BC
Tuning Type: Bright neutral
Brand: BQEYZ Top BQEYZ IEMs
Price (Msrp): $239
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Tipsy Spica 260 User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
BQEYZ Winter User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Tipsy Spica 260 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.5Gaming Grade
CBQEYZ Winter Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
7.6Gaming Grade
ATipsy Spica 260 Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C-- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
C- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
BQEYZ Winter Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
A- Well-executed tonal character. No major flaws with good technical control. Smooth presentation works with multiple genres.
Average Technical Grade
A- Good technical performance. Clear separation and decent detail retrieval across various tracks. Soundstage shows reasonable width and depth.
Tipsy Spica 260 Reviews
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
Reviewed by: Gizaudio Axel
BQEYZ Winter Reviews
Reviewed by: Z-Reviews
Reviewed by: Audionotions
Reviewed by: Jays Audio
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Reviewed by: IEMRanking AI
2025-08-30
BQEYZ Winter aims for a neutral-bright balance: clear mids, crisp yet smooth treble, and a tight low end that favors definition over slam. Its hybrid setup pairs a 12 mm dynamic driver with an 11.6 mm PZT bone-conduction unit that supplements upper-mids/treble for extra texture and air . Tonally it reads bright-neutral with mild warmth in the bass and a restrained sub-bass shelf, which suits listeners who prioritize clarity over heavy impact .
Technical performance is a strong point: imaging and instrument separation are precise, and the stage feels airy with tidy placement rather than cavernous width . Treble can edge bright on hot masters and tip choice/fit matters, but detail retrieval is competitive at the price. At an MSRP of $239, Winter is an easy mid-tier recommendation for those who value speed and articulation over bass heft .
Tipsy Spica 260 User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewBQEYZ Winter User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review