Softears RSV VS Yanyin Mahina

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs
My Ranking My Favorites

Softears RSV and Yanyin Mahina are in-ear monitors. Softears RSV costs $730 while Yanyin Mahina costs $650. Softears RSV is $80 more expensive. Softears RSV holds a decisive 1.7-point edge in reviewer scores (7.4 vs 5.8). Softears RSV carries a user score of 7. Yanyin Mahina has better bass with a 0.8-point edge, Softears RSV has better mids with a 0.9-point edge, Softears RSV has better treble with a 0.7-point edge, Yanyin Mahina has significantly better details with a 1.8-point edge and Yanyin Mahina has significantly better imaging with a 1.3-point edge.

Insights

Metric Softears RSV Yanyin Mahina
Bass 6.8 7.5
Mids 8.4 7.5
Treble 7.7 7
Details 6.2 8
Soundstage 7.5 7.5
Imaging 6.2 7.5
Dynamics 5.5 5.8
Tonality 7.7 7.3
Technicalities 7 7.7

Softears RSV Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision Nymz
Gizaudio Axel Crin Shuwa-T Tim Tuned
Jays Audio Jaytiss Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

7.4

Generally Favorable

Yanyin Mahina Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Super* Review
Shuwa-T

Average Reviewer Score:

5.8

Mixed

Reviews Comparison

Softears RSV reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 8* * score normalized
check links for more info:

Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel
YouTube video thumbnail

Yanyin Mahina reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 4* * score normalized
check links for more info:

Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

Softears RSV reviewed by Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 7.4 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A- Tech
Mid and vocal centric set, this is not reference tuning despite the name

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: A- Mids: A+ Treble: A Soundstage: A- Details: A Imaging: A

Yanyin Mahina reviewed by Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 7.5 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A Tech
Comment: Best yanyin so far. Same as moonlight but heavier bass response Because of the heavier bass region, it does not sound the most balanced

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: A Mids: A Treble: A- Soundstage: A Details: A+ Imaging: A

Softears RSV (more reviews)

Softears RSV reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 8.5 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
A+ Tech
One of the best vocals I've heard on any IEM (especially for male artists). Mids and Treble is TOTL, smooth and well extended and has great naturalness and the perfect bite. Bass has great speed and still slams (even though it's BA? not rumbly), but stage and detail is average at it's price, but once it clicks with a track it's one of the most beautiful thing ever. Ran into distortion issues at high volume, but may be due to my source? (RSV too sensitive?)

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel
YouTube video thumbnail

Softears RSV reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 8.3 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A+ Tech
Great upper treble, but its overall tonality isn't perfect.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: A+ Treble: A+ Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: A+
YouTube video thumbnail

Softears RSV reviewed by Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 7.5 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A Tech
I prefer the Studio 4. Warmer, bassier, and slightly more resolving than the Studio 4, with great timbre. BA Bass.

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

Softears RSV reviewed by Crin

Crin 7.5 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
A- Tech
Very well-balanced tonality with surprisingly good timbre, though slightly lacking definition.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Softears RSV reviewed by Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 7 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A- Tech
Timbre so beautiful you think it's not a BA set

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A+ Mids: S Treble: A+
YouTube video thumbnail

Softears RSV reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 6.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
B Tech
Well-tuned from top-to-bottom with good timbre. Safe to the point of boredom.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: B Mids: S Treble: A+ Dynamics: B Details: B Imaging: B

Softears RSV reviewed by Nymz

Nymz 6.3 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
C+ Tech
A BA set that almost sounds like a DD. Needs low OI source. Bass close to U12T with more mid-bass impact. Great treble. Sub-bass and imaging can be lacking for some. My favourite vocals ever.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: B Mids: A+ Treble: A- Details: C+ Imaging: C+

Softears RSV User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score:

Based on 1 user reviews

7

Generally Favorable

Yanyin Mahina User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Softears RSV Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.7

Gaming Grade

B+

Yanyin Mahina Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7.1

Gaming Grade

A-

Softears RSV Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Well-executed tonal character. No major flaws with good technical control. Smooth presentation works with multiple genres.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • Competent technical presentation. Handles separation and detail well in most tracks, with modest soundstage and acceptable imaging capabilities.
Bass B+
Good bass foundation with decent impact. Maintains acceptable control while providing satisfying thump in most tracks.
Mids A+
Superb midrange that's rich and resolving. Exceptional transparency and micro-details with perfect vocal/instrument balance.
Treble A
Excellent treble: airy, extended and well-controlled. Great micro-detail retrieval without sibilance or harshness.
Dynamics B-
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage A
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Details B
Good resolution with clear articulation of nuances. Reveals recording nuances and maintains clarity in complex passages.
Imaging B
Good imaging with precise instrument placement. Clear localization within the soundstage including front/back positioning.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Yanyin Mahina Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A-
  • Pleasing tonal balance with good technical control. Minor quirks present but not distracting. Demonstrates decent genre versatility.

Average Technical Grade

A
  • Good technical performance. Clear separation and decent detail retrieval across various tracks. Soundstage shows reasonable width and depth.
Bass A
Strong, well-defined bass with good texture. Delivers satisfying punch and rumble without overwhelming other frequencies.
Mids A
Excellent midrange with natural timbre and great detail retrieval. Vocals are forward and emotive with lifelike instrument reproduction.
Treble A-
Excellent treble: airy, extended and well-controlled. Great micro-detail retrieval without sibilance or harshness.
Soundstage A
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Details A+
Exceptional resolution that uncovers the deepest layers. Retrieves even the most minute details while maintaining natural timbre.
Imaging A
Excellent imaging: precise and stable placement. Instruments occupy specific points in space with tangible positions.
Gaming A-
Good fundamental spatial awareness for most gaming scenarios. Handles basic positioning well but may lack nuance in complex situations. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Softears RSV User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
Makavelian
7

Solid pick at used prices for those wanting a neutral sound with hint of sub-bass oomph.

Pros
Excellent balanced, all rounder sound signature with natural tonality, vocal reproduction is particularly pleasing.
Cons
Hint of darkness in upper registers affecting overall sense of resolution, bass texture could be better.

Yanyin Mahina User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Recommended Pages

Page
Available IEMs (in stock)
Best IEMs under $50
Best IEMs under $100
Best IEMs under $200
Best IEMs under $600
Best IEMs under $1000
Best bass quality IEMs
Best dynamic range IEMs
IEMs with widest soundstage
IEMs with most details
IEMs with best imaging
Best value IEMs from below $50
Best value IEMs from $50 - $100
Best value IEMs from $100 - $200
Best value IEMs from $200 - $400
Best value IEMs from $400 - $600
Best value IEMs from $600 - $1,000
Buy

Footer