Geek Wold 10 - Reviews & Ratings
1 Review (D Tier | 3/10)
IEMRanking.com
Home
Geek Wold 10
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
3Very Poor
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
3Gaming Grade
DGeek Wold 10 Details
Driver Configuration: 2DD+1BA+2P
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $45
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Precogvision
3
Reviewer Score
D
Tuning
D
Tech
Coherency and highs need work.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: D
Mids: C-
Treble: E+
Dynamics: D
Details: D
Imaging: D
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Geek Wold 10 Infos
Compare Geek Wold 10 to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Geek Wold 10 vs. Tin Hifi C3
Similar overall performance.
|
6.5 |
|
Geek Wold 10 vs. Juzear Clear
Juzear Clear offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
|
6.4 |
|
Geek Wold 10 vs. INAWAKEN DAWN Ms
INAWAKEN DAWN Ms offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
|
6 |
|
Geek Wold 10 vs. Intime Sora Light
Intime Sora Light offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
|
6 |
|
Geek Wold 10 vs. ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
|
5.8 |
|
Geek Wold 10 vs. Kefine Klean
Kefine Klean offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
|
5.7 |
|
Geek Wold 10 vs. CCA Rhapsody
CCA Rhapsody offers better treble and mids.
|
5.7 |
|
Geek Wold 10 vs. HBB KZ PR2
Similar overall performance.
|
5.5 |
|
Geek Wold 10 vs. EPZ Q5
EPZ Q5 offers better treble and mids.
|
5.5 |
|
Geek Wold 10 vs. Simgot EW200
Simgot EW200 offers better treble, bass and details.
|
5.5 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
D- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
D- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass
D
Bass is light and underwhelming. While some faint rumble exists, it lacks punch and authority in any meaningful way.
Mids
C-
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble
E+
Treble is noticeably dark and lacking extension. Cymbals lack shimmer and high-frequency details are obscured.
Dynamics
D
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Details
D
Modest detail presentation with significant loss of texture. Nuances are masked and complex passages become congested.
Imaging
D
Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning. Lacks precision for center placement and suffers from positional blurring.
Gaming
D
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review