Moondrop SSR - Reviews & Ratings

5 Reviews (C Tier | 4.5/10)

Home Moondrop SSR

Summary

Based on 5 reviews, the Moondrop SSR is drawing mixed impressions from reviewers, with opinions often splitting along personal preferences.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

4.5

Unfavorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.1

Gaming Grade

C-

Reviews

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 7* * score rescaled + normalized

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 4.5 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
B- Tech
Probably as close as one can get to "true DF", though it's extremely shouty as a result.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 4.1 Reviewer Score
D+ Tuning
C Tech
Overly spicy upper midrange and treble

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: D Mids: C- Treble: C- Soundstage: C+ Details: C Imaging: C-

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 3.6 Reviewer Score
D+ Tuning
C- Tech
Shouty thanks to 13dB of pinna compensation, but excellent note definition and imaging for the price.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+ Mids: D Treble: D Dynamics: D Details: C+ Imaging: C+

Reviewed by: Nymz

Nymz 3.1 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
D Tech
Shoutfest and too much energy uptop for my likes, but good bass and technicalities for the price.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: C- Mids: C- Treble: E+ Details: D Imaging: D

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Moondrop SSR Infos

Discuss Moondrop SSR with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Moondrop SSR discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare Moondrop SSR to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Moondrop SSR vs. Kbear KB02
Kbear KB02 offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
6.3
Moondrop SSR vs. HZSound Heart Mirror Zero
Similar overall performance.
6.2
Moondrop SSR vs. 7HZ G1
7HZ G1 offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
6.1
Moondrop SSR vs. Simgot EW200
Simgot EW200 offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
6
Moondrop SSR vs. ARTTI R2
Similar overall performance.
6
Moondrop SSR vs. ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
5.8
Moondrop SSR vs. KZ D-Fi
KZ D-Fi offers better treble, mids and imaging.
5.7
Moondrop SSR vs. EPZ G10
Similar overall performance.
5.5
Moondrop SSR vs. BLON BL-Max
Similar overall performance.
5.5
Moondrop SSR vs. Kiwi Ears Cadenza
Kiwi Ears Cadenza offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
5.4
Best IEMs from below $50

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D+
  • The tuning lacks refinement, jumping between dull and shouty without settling. Vocals frequently sound off-kilter.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Even moderate complexity exposes the limited resolution and narrow sense of space. Technical fans will find it lacking.
Bass C-
It keeps the low end tidy, though energy and weight remain limited. It favors balance over excitement.
Mids D+
Expect a rollercoaster midrange where coloration constantly distracts. Complex vocals turn metallic and unnatural.
Treble D
Treble response is uneven, jumping between dull spots and sharp peaks. Peaks poke out unpredictably.
Dynamics D
The presentation feels restrained, with transients arriving blunted and slow. Rhythms lack the expected drive.
Soundstage C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width and a modest step forward in depth perception. There's a mild sense of width to enjoy.
Details C-
Average resolution that reveals the basics while missing many of the subtleties. It reveals enough to stay engaging.
Imaging C-
Separation is good enough for casual listening yet misses audiophile precision. Depth remains limited but present.
Gaming C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer