Tanchjim Tanya [4.1/10]
Reviews (6), scores and comparisons for Tanchjim Tanya
IEMRanking.com
Home
Tanchjim Tanya
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
4.1Unfavorable
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
3.8Gaming Grade
D+Tanchjim Tanya Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD
Tuning Type: Warm V
Brand: TANCHJIM Top TANCHJIM IEMs
Price (Msrp): $24
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Super* Review
6*
* score normalized
Reviewed by: Crin
5
Reviewer Score
C+
Tuning
C+
Tech
Reviewed by: Precogvision
4.2
Reviewer Score
C+
Tuning
D+
Tech
Remarkably well-balanced tuning and slightly out of head imaging.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+
Mids: B
Treble: C-
Dynamics: C-
Details: D
Imaging: C-
Reviewed by: Shuwa-T
4.1
Reviewer Score
C-
Tuning
C-
Tech
Comment: Bass-boosted, warmer sounding Quarks with similar resolution.
Harman-tuned inoffensive sound
Can sound muddy on crowded tracks
Bass: C
Mids: C-
Treble: C-
Soundstage: C-
Details: C-
Imaging: C-
Reviewed by: Audionotions
3
Reviewer Score
Bought for the filters. It's not a bad set to throw in the backpack. Nothing special but also not offensive. Previously Owned
Reviewed by: Nymz
2
Reviewer Score
E+
Tuning
E+
Tech
Bad fit (bullet style). Ok for the price but I can't really rec it. Needs a lot of power, which is a non-sense. Great acessories. Stage presentation is good but depth isn't. Bloated tuning.
Bass: E+
Mids: E+
Treble: E+
Details: E+
Imaging: E+
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Tanchjim Tanya Infos
Compare Tanchjim Tanya to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Tanchjim Tanya vs. 7hz Zero 2 x Crinacle
7hz Zero 2 x Crinacle offers better mids, soundstage and dynamics.
|
6.1 |
|
Tanchjim Tanya vs. Tanchjim Bunny
Tanchjim Bunny offers better soundstage, mids and treble.
|
6 |
|
Tanchjim Tanya vs. Kinera Celest Wyvern Black
Similar overall performance.
|
5.8 |
|
Tanchjim Tanya vs. Moondrop Chu II
Similar overall performance.
|
5.5 |
|
Tanchjim Tanya vs. Final Audio E500
Final Audio E500 offers better details, imaging and soundstage.
|
5.5 |
|
Tanchjim Tanya vs. Tanchjim One
Tanchjim One offers better imaging, details and soundstage.
|
5.4 |
|
Tanchjim Tanya vs. Tangzu Waner 2
Tangzu Waner 2 offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
5.3 |
|
Tanchjim Tanya vs. Kiwi Ears Dolce
Kiwi Ears Dolce offers better mids and soundstage.
|
5.3 |
|
Tanchjim Tanya vs. Moondrop Jiu
Moondrop Jiu offers better treble, mids and bass.
|
5.2 |
|
Tanchjim Tanya vs. ND Planet
ND Planet offers better mids, dynamics and treble.
|
5.2 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C-- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
D+- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass
D+
Bass is light and underwhelming. While some faint rumble exists, it lacks punch and authority in any meaningful way.
Mids
C-
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble
D
Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.
Dynamics
C-
Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.
Soundstage
C-
Average soundstage - adequate width but flat presentation. Reasonable instrument separation but lacks layering and depth.
Details
D
Modest detail presentation with significant loss of texture. Nuances are masked and complex passages become congested.
Imaging
D
Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning. Lacks precision for center placement and suffers from positional blurring.
Gaming
D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review