Tanchjim Tanya - Reviews & Ratings

7 Reviews (C Tier | 4.5/10)

Home Tanchjim Tanya

Summary

Based on 7 reviews, the Tanchjim Tanya is drawing mixed impressions from reviewers, with opinions often splitting along personal preferences.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

4.5

Unfavorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.8

Gaming Grade

D+

Reviews

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 6* * score rescaled + normalized

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 4.2 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
D+ Tech
Remarkably well-balanced tuning and slightly out of head imaging.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+ Mids: B Treble: C- Dynamics: C- Details: D Imaging: C-

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 4.1 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
C- Tech
Comment: Bass-boosted, warmer sounding Quarks with similar resolution. Harman-tuned inoffensive sound Can sound muddy on crowded tracks

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: C Mids: C- Treble: C- Soundstage: C- Details: C- Imaging: C-

Reviewed by: Audionotions

Audionotions 3 Reviewer Score
Bought for the filters. It's not a bad set to throw in the backpack. Nothing special but also not offensive.

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

Reviewed by: Nymz

Nymz 2 Reviewer Score
E+ Tuning
E+ Tech
Bad fit (bullet style). Ok for the price but I can't really rec it. Needs a lot of power, which is a non-sense. Great acessories. Stage presentation is good but depth isn't. Bloated tuning.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: E+ Mids: E+ Treble: E+ Details: E+ Imaging: E+

Reviewed by: Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 7 * score rescaled + normalized
22 community members have rated the Tanchjim Tanya at an average of 4.4/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Excellent.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Tanchjim Tanya Infos

Discuss Tanchjim Tanya with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Tanchjim Tanya discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare Tanchjim Tanya to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Tanchjim Tanya vs. CCA Phoenix
CCA Phoenix offers better details, bass and imaging.
6.6
Tanchjim Tanya vs. KZ Saga Balanced
Similar overall performance.
6.4
Tanchjim Tanya vs. Tanchjim Bunny
Tanchjim Bunny offers better soundstage, mids and treble.
6.1
Tanchjim Tanya vs. 7hz Zero 2 x Crinacle
7hz Zero 2 x Crinacle offers better mids, soundstage and dynamics.
6
Tanchjim Tanya vs. Tangzu Waner 2
Tangzu Waner 2 offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
5.9
Tanchjim Tanya vs. NiceHCK DB2
NiceHCK DB2 offers better soundstage and dynamics.
5.9
Tanchjim Tanya vs. Kinera Celest Wyvern Black
Similar overall performance.
5.8
Tanchjim Tanya vs. KZ Taurus
KZ Taurus offers better treble, mids and soundstage.
5.8
Tanchjim Tanya vs. Moondrop Chu II
Similar overall performance.
5.8
Tanchjim Tanya vs. Tanchjim One
Tanchjim One offers better imaging, details and soundstage.
5.8
Best IEMs from below $50

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C-
  • Uneven emphasis across the spectrum keeps the presentation unsettled and awkward. Acoustic instruments lose their natural body.

Average Technical Grade

D+
  • Resolution is limited, masking finer nuances and narrowing the soundstage. Busy mixes still overwhelm it with ease.
Bass D+
It hints at bass presence but never quite delivers satisfying punch. Percussion lacks a satisfying weight.
Mids C-
It delivers a workable midrange that could benefit from smoother transitions. Timbre isn't quite convincing yet.
Treble D
Treble balance wavers, creating a mix of recessed detail and harsh flashes. Highs feel restless and unfocused.
Dynamics C-
It maintains a steady dynamic profile that neither offends nor inspires. Swells arrive but lack drama.
Soundstage C-
Average soundstage with adequate width but a flat presentation that lacks meaningful layering. Width is acceptable but not exciting.
Details D
Information density overwhelms it quickly, so finer layers fade beneath the surface. Intricate passages blur when pushed.
Imaging D
Depth barely registers, so the stage resembles a shallow arc. Depth cues are barely sketched.
Gaming D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer