Dita Project M VS 64 Audio U6t

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

Dita Project M and 64 Audio U6t are in-ear monitors. Dita Project M costs $350 while 64 Audio U6t costs $1,300. 64 Audio U6t is $950 more expensive. 64 Audio U6t holds a decisive 2-point edge in reviewer scores (5.9 vs 7.9). 64 Audio U6t has significantly better bass with a 1-point edge, 64 Audio U6t has significantly better mids with a 1.8-point edge, 64 Audio U6t has slightly better treble with a 0.3-point edge, 64 Audio U6t has significantly better dynamics with a 3.5-point edge, 64 Audio U6t has better soundstage with a 0.5-point edge and Dita Project M has significantly better details with a 1-point edge.

Insights

Metric Dita Project M 64 Audio U6t
Bass 6 7
Mids 5.8 7.5
Treble 5.8 6
Details 7 6
Soundstage 6.5 7
Imaging 7 7
Dynamics 3 6.5
Tonality 5.6 6.8
Technicalities 6.3 5.9

Dita Project M Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss
Shuwa-T Gizaudio Axel

Average Reviewer Score:

5.9

Mixed


64 Audio U6t Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss
Precogvision
Drew / Audionotions
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

7.9

Strongly Favorable


Dita Project M User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

64 Audio U6t User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Dita Project M Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.9

Gaming Grade

B-

64 Audio U6t Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.1

Gaming Grade

C+

Dita Project M Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass B
Good bass foundation with decent impact. Maintains acceptable control while providing satisfying thump in most tracks.
Mids B-
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble B-
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics D
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Soundstage B+
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details A-
Excellent detail retrieval: highly resolving without being clinical. Effortlessly reveals micro-details and textural subtleties.
Imaging A-
Excellent imaging: precise and stable placement. Instruments occupy specific points in space with tangible positions.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

64 Audio U6t Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

B-
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass A-
Strong, well-defined bass with good texture. Delivers satisfying punch and rumble without overwhelming other frequencies.
Mids A
Excellent midrange with natural timbre and great detail retrieval. Vocals are forward and emotive with lifelike instrument reproduction.
Treble B
Good treble response - clear and detailed without fatigue. Well-extended with proper air and sparkle.
Dynamics B+
Good dynamic expression with solid impact. Handles volume contrasts well while maintaining good transient snap.
Soundstage A-
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Details B
Good resolution with clear articulation of nuances. Reveals recording nuances and maintains clarity in complex passages.
Imaging A-
Excellent imaging: precise and stable placement. Instruments occupy specific points in space with tangible positions.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Dita Project M Reviews

Shuwa-T 6.7 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
A- Tech
Upper midrange detail, treble extension Upper midrange leading to lower treble leans bright, can come across too thin

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

- Shuwa-T
Bass: B Mids: B+ Treble: B+ Soundstage: A- Details: A- Imaging: A-
Gizaudio Axel 6 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
A- Tech
Impressive bass, airy treble, great resolution. Bright treble, mid-range timbre.

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel
- Gizaudio Axel
Jaytiss 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech
It's pretty but poorly tuned.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
- Jaytiss
Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: D Soundstage: B

64 Audio U6t Reviews

Super* Review 9* * score normalized
check links for more info:

Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel
- Super* Review
Drew / Audionotions 8.5 Reviewer Score
It's a step down from U12T in techs, yes, but it's still competitive in the price range. In exchange, tonality and timbre are much improved, which, IMO, is much more important. Imaging, separation, resolution, stage, and dynamics are excellent. Bass is deep and very well textured. Mids have great body. Treble is detailed and extended with great air while never being sibilant or harsh. Really easy to pop on and get lost in the music with. Warm and gooey in the best way possible. Lush, rich, soulful. Previously Owned

Drew / Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

- Drew / Audionotions
Precogvision 7.1 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
B+ Tech
Warm, thick, and with excellent dynamics. U12t's tubby younger brother that could use more resolution.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
- Precogvision
Bass: A- Mids: S Treble: A- Dynamics: A- Details: B Imaging: A-
Jaytiss 6.8 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
C+ Tech
Nice graph, but images weird for an iem of this cost.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
- Jaytiss
Mids: B Treble: C+ Dynamics: B Soundstage: A-

Dita Project M User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

64 Audio U6t User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer