QKZ x HBB VS Tanchjim Zero Ultima

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

QKZ x HBB and Tanchjim Zero Ultima are in-ear monitors. QKZ x HBB costs $20 while Tanchjim Zero Ultima costs $20. QKZ x HBB is $0 more expensive. Tanchjim Zero Ultima holds a decisive 1.2-point edge in reviewer scores (4.4 vs 5.6). Tanchjim Zero Ultima has better bass with a 0.8-point edge, Tanchjim Zero Ultima has significantly better mids with a 2.4-point edge, Tanchjim Zero Ultima has significantly better treble with a 1.2-point edge, Tanchjim Zero Ultima has significantly better details with a 1.6-point edge and Tanchjim Zero Ultima has significantly better imaging with a 2.2-point edge.

Insights

Metric QKZ x HBB Tanchjim Zero Ultima
Bass 4 4.8
Mids 3 5.4
Treble 4 5.2
Details 3 4.6
Soundstage 4.4 4.8
Imaging 3 5.2
Dynamics 4.4 5.3
Tonality 5.9 5.8
Technicalities 4.5 4.4
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Tanchjim Zero Ultima reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

QKZ x HBB Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

4.4

Unfavorable


Tanchjim Zero Ultima Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

5.6

Mixed


Reviews Comparison

QKZ x HBB (more reviews)

QKZ x HBB reviewed by Kois Archive

Kois Archive 6 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
B Tech
Rating: B- | Value: ⭐⭐ | Comfort: 7 soundstage at this price? so much bass

Kois Archive original ranking

Kois Archive Youtube Channel

QKZ x HBB reviewed by Fresh Reviews

Fresh Reviews 5.5* * The score of this reviewer influences only the Gaming Score

QKZ x HBB reviewed by Audionotions

Audionotions 4.5 Reviewer Score
Fun, cheap, well-tuned. And the kicker - the treble extension is absurd for the price! However, aesthetically they are a tragedy. In this price range, value prop is often increased in the form of great value accessories - the cable here is not widely usable, however, so no extra value here.

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

QKZ x HBB reviewed by Crin

Crin 4.5 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
C- Tech

QKZ x HBB reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 4 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
C+ Tech
Very well tuned warm/bassy set. Not basshead like the Rosefinch, but still has good bass impact as well as upholding enough treble extension.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

QKZ x HBB reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 4* * score rescaled + normalized

QKZ x HBB reviewed by Nymz

Nymz 3.4 Reviewer Score
D+ Tuning
D Tech
Amazing warm tonality with adequate techs for the bracket that turns into a ultra-budget nice alternative to the usual suspects.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: C- Mids: D Treble: C- Details: D Imaging: D

Tanchjim Zero Ultima (more reviews)

Tanchjim Zero Ultima reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 5 * score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary

Tanchjim Zero Ultima comes in dirt-cheap and unapologetically simple: an attached 3.5 mm cable with inline mic, featherweight shells (~2.3 g), and hilariously oversized nozzles for such tiny housings. Build cues scream budget—y-split quirks and all—but the box stuffs in a plush pouch, a stack of tips, and a manual with more pages than dollars. Under the hood sits a 10 mm double-chamber DD (DMT4), and it can want a bit of juice, yet nothing a normal source can’t handle.

Sonically, this is shock therapy for the price bracket: huge, cinematic soundstage that projects like a mini “screen” in front, with a surprisingly balanced tuning—not a bass cannon, not a treble sabre. Kick drums land with a clean thump, strings float way out without turning sharp, and the overall presentation stays cohesive instead of “fake-detail” crispy. It’s the kind of set that makes $20–$25 feel like a typo, happily chewing through AC/DC, Barry White, Pink Floyd, and Deadmau5 without crying mercy.

Value play is off the charts: call it a $40 performer sold for pocket change, perfect as a daily beater or keychain set. If a detachable cable is a must, the Bunny sibling stands by, but Zero Ultima’s stage and easygoing balance are the party trick here. Bottom line: audiophile nonsense in the best way—ridiculous width, no harshness tax, and an infectious fun factor that embarrasses pricier toys.


Z-Reviews original ranking

Z-Reviews Youtube Channel

Tanchjim Zero Ultima reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 6.6 * score rescaled + normalized
15 community members have rated the TANCHJIM Zero Ultima at an average of 4.2/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Very Positive.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Tanchjim Zero Ultima reviewed by Web Search

uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 5.1 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
C- Tech

The Tanchjim Zero Ultima uses a single dynamic driver with a dual-chamber design (DMT 4 Ultra), rated at 30 Ω, 123 dB/Vrms sensitivity and a 10–48 kHz claimed response; build is very light and the cable includes an inline mic on the 3.5 mm version. These specifications point to easy drivability from phones and dongles, though the relatively high sensitivity can expose source noise. Pricing sits firmly in the budget tier (about €19.90 in the EU), which sets expectations for technical performance.

Tonally, Zero Ultima trends warm-neutral / neutral-with-bass-lift: a modest mid-bass rise for body, forward yet controlled upper-mids for clarity, and generally smooth treble that avoids harsh peaks. This aligns with reports describing an easy, “safe” balance that works across genres without obvious problem areas, though it’s not the most airy set.

Technicalities are respectable for the price: detail retrieval is decent and imaging is tidy, but soundstage is on the intimate side and macrodynamic slam is limited compared with higher-end single-DD sets. Ergonomics are generally friendly, though the relatively large nozzle (≈6.4–6.5 mm) may challenge smaller ears; tip choice matters for both fit and bass seal. Overall, Zero Ultima offers a competent, neutral-leaning tuning with honest—but not class-leading—technical performance at a very low cost.


Bass: C Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: C Details: C Imaging: C+

QKZ x HBB User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Tanchjim Zero Ultima User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

QKZ x HBB Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.9

Gaming Grade

C

Tanchjim Zero Ultima Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.8

Gaming Grade

C

QKZ x HBB Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • Expect a friendly tonal balance that could use polish but remains inviting. Great for casual listening, less so for purists.

Average Technical Grade

C
  • Details smear quickly, leaving the presentation cramped and low on definition. You'll notice smearing on even moderately layered songs.
Bass C-
The bass remains polite, offering definition without much drive. Dynamics remain gentle even at higher volume.
Mids D
Tonal balance in the mids is erratic, with certain notes leaping out unnaturally. Certain notes leap out while others vanish.
Treble C-
Treble is adequate overall, though its texture can feel coarse. Longer sessions may expose grain.
Details D
Information density overwhelms it quickly, so finer layers fade beneath the surface. Intricate passages blur when pushed.
Imaging D
Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning that never quite nails the center image. Left/right cues exist but are rough.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

Tanchjim Zero Ultima Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • The tuning leans easygoing, yet occasional unevenness nudges it away from greatness. A bit of EQ polish can smooth things nicely.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Textural information blurs together, making the stage feel pinched and gray. Instrument edges blur together frequently.
Bass C
The bass remains polite, offering definition without much drive. Dynamics remain gentle even at higher volume.
Mids C+
The region sounds agreeable overall, delivering clarity without flashiness. Slight warmth keeps things easy-going.
Treble C+
Treble feels agreeable overall, bringing sparkle without significant fatigue. You get a polite sense of air.
Dynamics C+
You get reliable macrodynamics, with micro shifts that remain only adequate. A reliable performer for most tracks.
Soundstage C
Stereo spread is acceptable, yet the image resembles a stage set without depth behind the curtain. Depth feels more like a gentle slope.
Details C
It conveys the core of each track yet glosses over the quieter gestures underneath. Delicate details remain a bit subdued.
Imaging C+
A stable phantom center appears, lending vocals a consistent anchor. It maintains a coherent phantom center.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

QKZ x HBB User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Tanchjim Zero Ultima User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Footer