QKZ x HBB Khan VS NF RA05 Type-C

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

QKZ x HBB Khan and NF RA05 Type-C are in-ear monitors. QKZ x HBB Khan costs $40 while NF RA05 Type-C costs $39. QKZ x HBB Khan is $1 more expensive. QKZ x HBB Khan holds a decisive 1.4-point edge in reviewer scores (3.7 vs 2.3). QKZ x HBB Khan has better mids with a 0.7-point edge, QKZ x HBB Khan has significantly better treble with a 2-point edge, QKZ x HBB Khan has significantly better dynamics with a 1-point edge and QKZ x HBB Khan has significantly better soundstage with a 2-point edge.

Insights

Metric QKZ x HBB Khan NF RA05 Type-C
Bass 5 2.3
Mids 4.7 4
Treble 3 1
Details 2 2.3
Soundstage 5 3
Imaging 2 2.3
Dynamics 2 1
Tonality 4.3 2.3
Technicalities 3.8 1
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough NF RA05 Type-C reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

QKZ x HBB Khan Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Nymz
Jaytiss
Jays Audio
Tim Tuned
Head-Fi.org

Average Reviewer Score:

3.7

Poor

NF RA05 Type-C Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

2.3

Very Negative

Reviews Comparison

QKZ x HBB Khan reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 3.3 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
E- Tech
Hard to recommend in a competitive market.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C- Treble: E- Dynamics: E+ Soundstage: C+

NF RA05 Type-C reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 2.3 Reviewer Score
E+ Tuning
E- Tech
I think this set is only recommended for those who need it for the fit or eq.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C- Treble: E- Dynamics: E- Soundstage: D

QKZ x HBB Khan (more reviews)

QKZ x HBB Khan reviewed by Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 5.5 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
A- Tech
Very well tuned, strong clean bass treble can use more eveness

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: B

QKZ x HBB Khan reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 4 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
C+ Tech
Same as the Crin Zero but with slightl more bass and less faitguing, although at the cost of more recessed vocals/mids. Mid-bass tuck affects libraries.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

QKZ x HBB Khan reviewed by Nymz

Nymz 2 Reviewer Score
E+ Tuning
E+ Tech
check links for more info:

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: E+ Mids: E+ Treble: E+ Details: E+ Imaging: E+

QKZ x HBB Khan reviewed by Audionotions

Audionotions 0.2 Reviewer Score
Low res. Too dark. Timbre is way off. Reminds me of an AM radio. Doesn't do much right if at all. An attempt was made and can't say much more than that.

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

QKZ x HBB Khan reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 7 * score rescaled + normalized
12 community members have rated the QKZ X HBB Khan at an average of 3.8/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Strongly Favorable.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

QKZ x HBB Khan User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

NF RA05 Type-C User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

QKZ x HBB Khan Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.9

Gaming Grade

D+

NF RA05 Type-C Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

1.4

Gaming Grade

E-

QKZ x HBB Khan Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C-
  • Expect a patchy tonal profile that makes instrumentation feel mismatched. EQ is almost mandatory to tame the response.

Average Technical Grade

D+
  • The tuning renders a cramped window into the music, with nuance fading fast. Expect grainy textures to creep in.
Bass C+
Bass performance is average—present enough but rarely inspiring. It neither offends nor impresses.
Mids C
It delivers a workable midrange that could benefit from smoother transitions. Timbre isn't quite convincing yet.
Treble D
Highs feel erratic, with dips and spikes that make the signature unpredictable. It alternates between splashy and dull.
Dynamics E+
Subtle shifts disappear, with transients lacking bite or urgency. Drum hits arrive without conviction.
Soundstage C+
Stage expands beyond the shoulders and finally hints at layers, though vertical cues stay muted. Depth cues begin to emerge.
Details E+
You hear the song, but the fine etchings that add realism are missing in action. It's a struggle to parse individual parts.
Imaging E+
Layering blurs because positional cues can't stay locked in place. Layering suffers from constant smearing.
Gaming D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

NF RA05 Type-C Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

E+
  • The tonal profile is unruly and tiring, forcing constant volume adjustments. Even spoken word sounds unnatural.

Average Technical Grade

E-
  • A foggy, one-dimensional presentation wipes out layering and obscures the finer points of a mix. Spatial cues barely register at all.
Mids C-
It delivers a workable midrange that could benefit from smoother transitions. Timbre isn't quite convincing yet.
Treble E-
Highs sound veiled and distant, draining life from the mix. Hi-hats fade before they start.
Dynamics E-
It cannot muster meaningful volume gradation, making tracks feel static. It drains life from energetic music.
Soundstage D
The presentation sketches a narrow arc while leaving the vertical and frontal layers untouched. Complex mixes blur together quickly.
Gaming E-
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

QKZ x HBB Khan User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

NF RA05 Type-C User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Footer