NF RA05 Type-C - Reviews & Ratings

1 Review (E Tier | 2.3/10)

Home NF RA05 Type-C

Summary

Based on 1 review, the NF RA05 Type-C is a weak option in reviewers' eyes, with praise limited to narrow scenarios.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

2.3

Very Negative

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

1.4

Gaming Grade

E-

Reviews

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 2.3 Reviewer Score
E+ Tuning
E- Tech
I think this set is only recommended for those who need it for the fit or eq.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C- Treble: E- Dynamics: E- Soundstage: D

NF RA05 Type-C Infos

Discuss NF RA05 Type-C with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "NF RA05 Type-C discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare NF RA05 Type-C to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough NF RA05 Type-C reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
NF RA05 Type-C vs. Kbear KB02
Kbear KB02 offers better dynamics, treble and soundstage.
6.4
NF RA05 Type-C vs. Moondrop Marigold
Moondrop Marigold offers better dynamics, treble and soundstage.
6.2
NF RA05 Type-C vs. HZSound Heart Mirror Zero
Similar overall performance.
6.2
NF RA05 Type-C vs. 7HZ G1
7HZ G1 offers better dynamics, treble and soundstage.
6.1
NF RA05 Type-C vs. Simgot EW200
Simgot EW200 offers better treble, dynamics and soundstage.
6
NF RA05 Type-C vs. ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra offers better dynamics, treble and soundstage.
6
NF RA05 Type-C vs. ARTTI R2
Similar overall performance.
6
NF RA05 Type-C vs. HZSOUND White Snow
HZSOUND White Snow offers better treble, dynamics and soundstage.
6
NF RA05 Type-C vs. KZ D-Fi
KZ D-Fi offers better treble, soundstage and mids.
5.7
NF RA05 Type-C vs. EPZ G10
Similar overall performance.
5.5
Best IEMs from below $50

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

E+
  • The tonal profile is unruly and tiring, forcing constant volume adjustments. Even spoken word sounds unnatural.

Average Technical Grade

E-
  • A foggy, one-dimensional presentation wipes out layering and obscures the finer points of a mix. Spatial cues barely register at all.
Mids C-
It delivers a workable midrange that could benefit from smoother transitions. Timbre isn't quite convincing yet.
Treble E-
Highs sound veiled and distant, draining life from the mix. Hi-hats fade before they start.
Dynamics E-
It cannot muster meaningful volume gradation, making tracks feel static. It drains life from energetic music.
Soundstage D
The presentation sketches a narrow arc while leaving the vertical and frontal layers untouched. Complex mixes blur together quickly.
Gaming E-
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer