NF RA05 Type-C - Reviews & Ratings

1 Review (E Tier | 2.3/10)

IEMRanking.com Home NF RA05 Type-C

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

2.3

Very Negative

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

1.4

Gaming Grade

E-

Reviews

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 2.3 Reviewer Score
E+ Tuning
E- Tech
I think this set is only recommended for those who need it for the fit or eq.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C- Treble: E- Dynamics: E- Soundstage: D

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

NF RA05 Type-C Infos

Compare NF RA05 Type-C to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
NF RA05 Type-C vs. ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra offers better dynamics, treble and soundstage.
5.8
NF RA05 Type-C vs. KZ D-Fi
KZ D-Fi offers better treble, soundstage and mids.
5.7
NF RA05 Type-C vs. Simgot EW200
Simgot EW200 offers better treble, dynamics and soundstage.
5.5
NF RA05 Type-C vs. Kiwi Ears Cadenza
Kiwi Ears Cadenza offers better dynamics, treble and soundstage.
5.3
NF RA05 Type-C vs. Final Audio E2000
Similar overall performance.
5.3
NF RA05 Type-C vs. 7HZ G1
7HZ G1 offers better dynamics, treble and soundstage.
5.3
NF RA05 Type-C vs. BLON x HBB Z300
BLON x HBB Z300 offers better treble.
5.1
NF RA05 Type-C vs. Moondrop Lan
Moondrop Lan offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
5
NF RA05 Type-C vs. TinHifi C2 Mech Warrior
TinHifi C2 Mech Warrior offers better treble and mids.
4.8
NF RA05 Type-C vs. Blon BL03
Blon BL03 offers better dynamics, treble and soundstage.
4.5
Best IEMs from below $50

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

E+
  • Tonally jarring or fatiguing. Frequency clashes (e.g., piercing treble, bloated bass) make extended listening unpleasant. Poor genre adaptation.

Average Technical Grade

E-
  • Noticeably blurred or congested. Struggles with basic instrument separation; details are lost in simple tracks. Feels "flat" and one-dimensional.
Mids C-
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble E-
Treble is extremely rolled off and veiled. High frequencies are barely perceptible with significant loss of detail.
Dynamics E-
Extremely poor dynamic expression. Lacks any sense of impact or volume gradation, making music feel one-dimensional.
Soundstage D
Modest soundstage that feels confined. Some left/right separation but completely lacks depth and height dimensions.
Gaming E-
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer