NF RA05 Type-C VS KZ D-Fi

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

NF RA05 Type-C and KZ D-Fi are in-ear monitors. NF RA05 Type-C costs $39 while KZ D-Fi costs $33. NF RA05 Type-C is $6 more expensive. KZ D-Fi holds a decisive 3.4-point edge in reviewer scores (2.3 vs 5.7). KZ D-Fi has significantly better mids with a 1.5-point edge, KZ D-Fi has significantly better treble with a 4-point edge and KZ D-Fi has significantly better soundstage with a 2.5-point edge.

Insights

Metric NF RA05 Type-C KZ D-Fi
Bass 2.3 5
Mids 4 5.5
Treble 1 5
Details 2.3 5.5
Soundstage 3 5.5
Imaging 2.3 5.5
Dynamics 1 5.7
Tonality 2.3 5.2
Technicalities 1 5.5
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough NF RA05 Type-C and KZ D-Fi reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

NF RA05 Type-C Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

2.3

Very Negative


KZ D-Fi Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

5.7

Mixed


Reviews Comparison

NF RA05 Type-C (more reviews)

NF RA05 Type-C reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 2.3 Reviewer Score
E+ Tuning
E- Tech
I think this set is only recommended for those who need it for the fit or eq.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C- Treble: E- Dynamics: E- Soundstage: D

KZ D-Fi (more reviews)

KZ D-Fi reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 6* * score rescaled + normalized

KZ D-Fi reviewed by Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 5.3 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
B- Tech
check links for more info:

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: C+ Mids: B- Treble: C+ Soundstage: B- Details: B- Imaging: B-

NF RA05 Type-C User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

KZ D-Fi User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

NF RA05 Type-C Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

1.4

Gaming Grade

E-

KZ D-Fi Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.4

Gaming Grade

C+

NF RA05 Type-C Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

E+
  • The tonal profile is unruly and tiring, forcing constant volume adjustments. Even spoken word sounds unnatural.

Average Technical Grade

E-
  • A foggy, one-dimensional presentation wipes out layering and obscures the finer points of a mix. Spatial cues barely register at all.
Mids C-
It delivers a workable midrange that could benefit from smoother transitions. Timbre isn't quite convincing yet.
Treble E-
Highs sound veiled and distant, draining life from the mix. Hi-hats fade before they start.
Dynamics E-
It cannot muster meaningful volume gradation, making tracks feel static. It drains life from energetic music.
Soundstage D
The presentation sketches a narrow arc while leaving the vertical and frontal layers untouched. Complex mixes blur together quickly.
Gaming E-
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

KZ D-Fi Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • The tuning leans easygoing, yet occasional unevenness nudges it away from greatness. A bit of EQ polish can smooth things nicely.

Average Technical Grade

B-
  • It offers a competent showing, maintaining cohesion on straightforward arrangements. Complex passages start to challenge it, but never derail the show.
Bass C+
It delivers adequate punch and texture, though nothing stands out. Sub-bass presence is hinted rather than delivered.
Mids B-
Expect a competent midrange that keeps vocals grounded and instruments clear. Tone is acceptable across multiple genres.
Treble C+
Expect a polite treble presentation that balances presence with restraint. Percussion carries a pleasant sparkle.
Soundstage B-
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width and a modest step forward in depth perception. There's a mild sense of width to enjoy.
Details B-
Ambient cues appear, albeit with softer focus than die-hard resolution seekers may prefer. You can follow supporting instruments well.
Imaging B-
A stable phantom center appears, lending vocals a consistent anchor. It maintains a coherent phantom center.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

NF RA05 Type-C User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

KZ D-Fi User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Footer