QKZ x HBB Khan [3/10]
Reviews (5), scores and comparisons for QKZ x HBB Khan
IEMRanking.com
Home
QKZ x HBB Khan
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
3Very Poor
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
3.9Gaming Grade
D+QKZ x HBB Khan Details
Driver Configuration:
Tuning Type: n/a
Brand: KZ Top KZ IEMs
Price (Msrp): $40
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Tim Tuned
5.5
Reviewer Score
B-
Tuning
A-
Tech
Very well tuned, strong clean bass
treble can use more eveness
Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A+
Mids: A+
Treble: B
Reviewed by: Jays Audio
4
Reviewer Score
B+
Tuning
C+
Tech
Same as the Crin Zero but with slightl more bass and less faitguing, although at the cost of more recessed vocals/mids. Mid-bass tuck affects libraries.
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
3.3
Reviewer Score
D
Tuning
E-
Tech
Hard to recommend in a competitive market.
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C-
Treble: E-
Dynamics: E+
Soundstage: C+
Reviewed by: Nymz
2
Reviewer Score
E+
Tuning
E+
Tech
check links for more info:
Bass: E+
Mids: E+
Treble: E+
Details: E+
Imaging: E+
Reviewed by: Audionotions
0.2
Reviewer Score
Low res. Too dark. Timbre is way off. Reminds me of an AM radio. Doesn't do much right if at all. An attempt was made and can't say much more than that. Previously Owned
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
QKZ x HBB Khan Infos
Compare QKZ x HBB Khan to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
QKZ x HBB Khan vs. ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra offers better dynamics, treble and soundstage.
|
5.8 |
|
QKZ x HBB Khan vs. KZ D-Fi
KZ D-Fi offers better details, imaging and treble.
|
5.7 |
|
QKZ x HBB Khan vs. Simgot EW200
Simgot EW200 offers better details, imaging and dynamics.
|
5.5 |
|
QKZ x HBB Khan vs. Kiwi Ears CADENZA
Kiwi Ears CADENZA offers better dynamics, details and imaging.
|
5.3 |
|
QKZ x HBB Khan vs. Final Audio E2000
Similar overall performance.
|
5.3 |
|
QKZ x HBB Khan vs. 7HZ G1
7HZ G1 offers better dynamics, treble and soundstage.
|
5.3 |
|
QKZ x HBB Khan vs. BLON x HBB Z300
BLON x HBB Z300 offers better details and imaging.
|
5.1 |
|
QKZ x HBB Khan vs. Moondrop Lan
Moondrop Lan offers better mids.
|
5 |
|
QKZ x HBB Khan vs. TinHifi C2 Mech Warrior
TinHifi C2 Mech Warrior offers better treble, mids and bass.
|
4.8 |
|
QKZ x HBB Khan vs. Blon BL03
Blon BL03 offers better dynamics, imaging and details.
|
4.5 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C-- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
D+- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass
C+
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids
C
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble
D
Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.
Dynamics
E+
Limited dynamic range with poor micro-detail. Subtle volume changes are lost, and transients lack proper attack.
Soundstage
C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Details
E+
Noticeably blurred and lacking definition. Background elements are smeared together and micro-details are inaudible.
Imaging
E+
Poor instrument placement with unstable positioning. Instruments drift and lack fixed locations within the sound field.
Gaming
D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review