Tri Draco VS Tangzu Waner 2

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Elysian Annihilator 2023 Compare IEMs

Tri Draco and Tangzu Waner 2 are in-ear monitors. Tri Draco costs $59 while Tangzu Waner 2 costs $25. Tri Draco is $34 more expensive. Tri Draco holds a slight 0.1-point edge in reviewer scores (5.4 vs 5.3). Tangzu Waner 2 has significantly better mids with a 1-point edge.

Insights

Metric Tri Draco Tangzu Waner 2
Bass 6 5.3
Mids 5 6
Treble 5 5
Details 5 5.3
Soundstage 5 5
Imaging 5 5.3
Dynamics 5.4 5
Tonality 5.7 5.9
Technicalities 5 5

Tri Draco Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Gizaudio Axel Shuwa-T

Average Reviewer Score:

5.4

Mixed to Negative


Tangzu Waner 2 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jays Audio
Z-Reviews
Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

5.3

Mixed to Negative


Tri Draco User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Tangzu Waner 2 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Tri Draco Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.2

Gaming Grade

C+

Tangzu Waner 2 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.3

Gaming Grade

C+

Tri Draco Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass B
Good bass foundation with decent impact. Maintains acceptable control while providing satisfying thump in most tracks.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Soundstage C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Details C+
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

Tangzu Waner 2 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Mids B
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

Tri Draco Reviews

Gizaudio Axel 5.5 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
C+ Tech
check links for more info:

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel
- Gizaudio Axel
Shuwa-T 5.2 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech
check links for more info:

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

- Shuwa-T
Bass: B Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Soundstage: C+ Details: C+ Imaging: C+

Tangzu Waner 2 Reviews

Jaytiss 6.3 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech
The stock USB C cable came jacked up.... lame.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
- Jaytiss
Mids: B Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: C+
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Tangzu Waner 2 or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $20

Buy Tangzu Waner 2 on HiFiGO
Z-Reviews 5.5 * score normalized
Jays Audio 4 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
C+ Tech
Balanced All-rounder. Basically the same as OG Waner but with a little more treble air, helps boost resolution and imaging by a tiny tiny bit. Accesories are great for the price, sancai tips + nice cable

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel
- Jays Audio
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Tangzu Waner 2 or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $20

Buy Tangzu Waner 2 on Linsoul

Tri Draco User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Tangzu Waner 2 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer