Tripowin Vivace VS QKZ HBB

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

Tripowin Vivace and QKZ HBB are 1DD in-ear monitors. Tripowin Vivace costs $29 while QKZ HBB costs $20. Tripowin Vivace is $9 more expensive. Both score 4 from reviewers.

Insights

Metric Tripowin Vivace QKZ HBB
Tonality 7 6.5
Technicalities 4.5 5

Tripowin Vivace Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Z-Reviews
Fresh Reviews Gizaudio Axel

Average Reviewer Score:

4

Unfavorable


QKZ HBB Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jays Audio
Fresh Reviews

Average Reviewer Score:

4

Unfavorable


Tripowin Vivace User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

QKZ HBB User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Tripowin Vivace Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.3

Gaming Grade

C+

QKZ HBB Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.5

Gaming Grade

B-

Tripowin Vivace Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A-
  • Pleasing tonal balance with good technical control. Minor quirks present but not distracting. Demonstrates decent genre versatility.

Average Technical Grade

C
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

QKZ HBB Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical.

Tripowin Vivace Reviews

Fresh Reviews 5.5* * The score of this reviewer influences only the Gaming Score
Gizaudio Axel 5.5 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
C Tech
check links for more info:

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel
- Gizaudio Axel
Z-Reviews 2.5 * score normalized

QKZ HBB Reviews

Fresh Reviews 5.5* * The score of this reviewer influences only the Gaming Score
good for $ - can border on C+

Fresh Reviews original ranking

Fresh Reviews Youtube Channel
- Fresh Reviews
Jays Audio 4 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
C+ Tech
Very well tuned warm/bassy set. Not basshead like the Rosefinch, but still has good bass impact as well as upholding enough treble extension.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel
- Jays Audio

Tripowin Vivace User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

QKZ HBB User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer