CCA CRA PRO [4/10]

Reviews (1), scores and comparisons for CCA CRA PRO

IEMRanking.com Home CCA CRA PRO

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

4

Unfavorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

2.6

Gaming Grade

D-

Reviews

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 4 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
E+ Tech
better wired

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: E+ Dynamics: D Soundstage: C+

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

CCA CRA PRO Infos

Compare CCA CRA PRO to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
CCA CRA PRO vs. KZ EDC PRO
KZ EDC PRO offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
5.5
CCA CRA PRO vs. Moondrop Chu II
Similar overall performance.
5.5
CCA CRA PRO vs. Kiwi Ears Dolce
Kiwi Ears Dolce offers better treble and dynamics.
5.3
CCA CRA PRO vs. Moondrop Quarks DSP
Moondrop Quarks DSP offers better treble and mids.
5.2
CCA CRA PRO vs. ND Planet
ND Planet offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
5.2
CCA CRA PRO vs. Venture Electronics Bonus In-Ears "BIE"
Venture Electronics Bonus In-Ears "BIE" offers better treble.
5.1
CCA CRA PRO vs. Tangzu Wan Er
Tangzu Wan Er offers better treble and mids.
5
CCA CRA PRO vs. CCA Polaris
CCA Polaris offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
5
CCA CRA PRO vs. Moondrop Chu
Moondrop Chu offers better treble and mids.
4.9
CCA CRA PRO vs. Moondrop Spaceship
Moondrop Spaceship offers better treble.
4.8
Best IEMs from below $50

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C-
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

E+
  • Noticeably blurred or congested. Struggles with basic instrument separation; details are lost in simple tracks. Feels "flat" and one-dimensional.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble E+
Treble is noticeably dark and lacking extension. Cymbals lack shimmer and high-frequency details are obscured.
Dynamics D
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Soundstage C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Gaming D-
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer