IEMRanking.com
Home
CCA CRA PRO
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
4Unfavorable
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
2.6Gaming Grade
D-CCA CRA PRO Details
Driver Configuration:
Tuning Type: n/a
Brand: CCA Top CCA IEMs
Price (Msrp): $16
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
CCA CRA PRO Infos
Compare CCA CRA PRO to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
IEM | alt. Score |
---|---|
CCA CRA PRO vs. KZ EDC PRO
KZ EDC PRO offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
|
5.5 |
CCA CRA PRO vs. Moondrop Chu II
Similar overall performance.
|
5.5 |
CCA CRA PRO vs. Kiwi Ears Dolce
Kiwi Ears Dolce offers better treble and dynamics.
|
5.3 |
CCA CRA PRO vs. Moondrop Quarks DSP
Moondrop Quarks DSP offers better treble and mids.
|
5.2 |
CCA CRA PRO vs. ND Planet
ND Planet offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
|
5.2 |
CCA CRA PRO vs. Venture Electronics Bonus In-Ears "BIE"
Venture Electronics Bonus In-Ears "BIE" offers better treble.
|
5.1 |
CCA CRA PRO vs. Tangzu Wan Er
Tangzu Wan Er offers better treble and mids.
|
5 |
CCA CRA PRO vs. CCA Polaris
CCA Polaris offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
|
5 |
CCA CRA PRO vs. Moondrop Chu
Moondrop Chu offers better treble and mids.
|
4.9 |
CCA CRA PRO vs. Moondrop Spaceship
Moondrop Spaceship offers better treble.
|
4.8 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C-- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
E+- Noticeably blurred or congested. Struggles with basic instrument separation; details are lost in simple tracks. Feels "flat" and one-dimensional.
Mids
C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble
E+
Treble is noticeably dark and lacking extension. Cymbals lack shimmer and high-frequency details are obscured.
Dynamics
D
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Soundstage
C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Gaming
D-
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review