CCA CSN - Reviews & Ratings

2 Reviews (C Tier | 4.7/10)

Home CCA CSN

Summary

Based on 2 reviews, the CCA CSN is earning praise from some reviewers while others stay unconvinced, resulting in a balanced verdict.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

4.7

Generally Unfavorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.1

Gaming Grade

D

Reviews

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 3.1 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
D Tech
A little sharp in the tuning, but decent overall. Respectable value for $20.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: D Mids: C- Treble: D Dynamics: D Details: D Imaging: D

Reviewed by: Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 6.3 * score rescaled + normalized
3 community members have rated the CCA CSN at an average of 4.0/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Very Positive.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

CCA CSN Infos

Discuss CCA CSN with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "CCA CSN discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare CCA CSN to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough CCA CSN reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
CCA CSN vs. KZ Saga Balanced
Similar overall performance.
6.4
CCA CSN vs. KZ Duonic
KZ Duonic offers better bass, details and dynamics.
6.4
CCA CSN vs. Nicehck StringSnow
Nicehck StringSnow offers better treble, details and bass.
5.9
CCA CSN vs. NiceHCK DB2
NiceHCK DB2 offers better dynamics.
5.9
CCA CSN vs. Moondrop Chu II
Similar overall performance.
5.8
CCA CSN vs. Tanchjim Zero Ultima
Tanchjim Zero Ultima offers better treble, dynamics and bass.
5.8
CCA CSN vs. ND Planet
ND Planet offers better bass, imaging and dynamics.
5.7
CCA CSN vs. Kiwi Ears Dolce
Kiwi Ears Dolce offers better mids and dynamics.
5.6
CCA CSN vs. QKZ HBB
Similar overall performance.
5.5
CCA CSN vs. TangZu Wan'er S.G
TangZu Wan'er S.G offers better bass, mids and treble.
5.3
Best IEMs from below $50

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D
  • Uneven emphasis across the spectrum keeps the presentation unsettled and awkward. Acoustic instruments lose their natural body.

Average Technical Grade

D
  • The tuning renders a cramped window into the music, with nuance fading fast. Expect grainy textures to creep in.
Bass D
Expect a restrained low end that prioritizes cleanliness over excitement. Impact comes across soft and restrained.
Mids C-
The region is listenable but lacks the finesse and clarity of better tuning. A touch of EQ can smooth things out.
Treble D
Treble response is uneven, jumping between dull spots and sharp peaks. Peaks poke out unpredictably.
Dynamics D
Dynamics come across throttled, leaving energetic moments underwhelming. Energetic passages land with a thud.
Details D
Modest detail presentation that sacrifices texture and masks subtle nuances. It conveys the basics but not the nuance.
Imaging D
Panning effects blur at the edges, making movement sound smeared. Fast panning effects smear noticeably.
Gaming D
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer