CCA CSN - Reviews & Ratings

1 Review (D Tier | 3.1/10)

IEMRanking.com Home CCA CSN

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision

Average Reviewer Score:

3.1

Very Poor

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.1

Gaming Grade

D

Reviews

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 3.1 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
D Tech
A little sharp in the tuning, but decent overall. Respectable value for $20.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: D Mids: C- Treble: D Dynamics: D Details: D Imaging: D

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

CCA CSN Infos

Compare CCA CSN to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
CCA CSN vs. Moondrop Chu II
Similar overall performance.
5.5
CCA CSN vs. Kiwi Ears Dolce
Kiwi Ears Dolce offers better mids and dynamics.
5.3
CCA CSN vs. ND Planet
ND Planet offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
5.2
CCA CSN vs. Venture Electronics Bonus In-Ears "BIE"
Venture Electronics Bonus In-Ears "BIE" offers better bass, treble and mids.
5.1
CCA CSN vs. Tangzu Wan Er
Tangzu Wan Er offers better bass, mids and treble.
5
CCA CSN vs. 7Hz Salnotes Zero
7Hz Salnotes Zero offers better details, mids and imaging.
5
CCA CSN vs. Moondrop Chu
Moondrop Chu offers better treble, mids and bass.
4.9
CCA CSN vs. Moondrop Spaceship
Moondrop Spaceship offers better treble.
4.8
CCA CSN vs. 7Hz Zero
7Hz Zero offers better mids, bass and treble.
4.7
CCA CSN vs. SIMGOT EW100P
Similar overall performance.
4.7
Best IEMs from below $50

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

D
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass D
Bass is light and underwhelming. While some faint rumble exists, it lacks punch and authority in any meaningful way.
Mids C-
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble D
Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.
Dynamics D
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Details D
Modest detail presentation with significant loss of texture. Nuances are masked and complex passages become congested.
Imaging D
Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning. Lacks precision for center placement and suffers from positional blurring.
Gaming D
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer