Blon BL03 VS QKZ x HBB Khan

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

My Ranking My Favorites

Blon BL03 and QKZ x HBB Khan are in-ear monitors. Blon BL03 costs $39 while QKZ x HBB Khan costs $40. QKZ x HBB Khan is $1 more expensive. Blon BL03 holds a decisive 1.5-point edge in reviewer scores (4.5 vs 3). QKZ x HBB Khan has better bass with a 0.8-point edge, QKZ x HBB Khan has slightly better mids with a 0.4-point edge, Blon BL03 has better treble with a 0.5-point edge, Blon BL03 has significantly better dynamics with a 2-point edge, Blon BL03 has slightly better soundstage with a 0.3-point edge, Blon BL03 has significantly better details with a 1.5-point edge and Blon BL03 has significantly better imaging with a 1.7-point edge.

Metric	Blon BL03	QKZ x HBB Khan
Bass	4.2	5
Mids	4.3	4.7
Treble	3.5	3
Details	3.5	2
Soundstage	5.3	5
Imaging	3.7	2
Dynamics	4	2
Tonality	4.4	4.3
Technicalities	3.9	3.8

Blon BL03 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Score:

4.5

Generally Unfavorable

Show all Blon BL03 reviews

QKZ x HBB Khan Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Score:

Very Poor

Show all QKZ x HBB Khan reviews

Driver Configuration: 1DD

Tuning Type: Warm V

Brand: Blon Top Blon IEMs

Price (Msrp): $39

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Buy your next IEM on

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Buy your next IEM on

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Buy your next IEM on

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Driver Configuration:

Tuning Type: n/a

Brand: KZ Top KZ IEMs

Price (Msrp): $40

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Buy your next IEM on

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Buy your next IEM on

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Buy your next IEM on

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Blon BL03 User Review Score

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

QKZ x HBB Khan User Review Score

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Blon BL03 Gaming Score

The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.1

Gaming Grade

C-

QKZ x HBB Khan Gaming Score

The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.9

Gaming Grade

D+

Blon BL03 Scorings

Average Tunign Grade

C-

Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

D+

Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.

Bass C-

Subdued bass response that stays mostly in the background. Lacks energy and impact but maintains basic definition.

Mids C-

Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.

Treble D+

Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.

Dynamics C-

Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.

Soundstage C+

Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.

Details D+

Modest detail presentation with significant loss of texture. Nuances are masked and complex passages become congested.

Imaging D+

Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning. Lacks precision for center placement and suffers from positional blurring.

Gaming C-

Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

QKZ x HBB Khan Scorings

Average Tunign Grade

C-

Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

D+

Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.

Bass C+

Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.

Mids C

Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.

Treble D

Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.

Dynamics E+

Limited dynamic range with poor micro-detail. Subtle volume changes are lost, and transients lack proper attack.

Soundstage C+

Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.

Details E+

Noticeably blurred and lacking definition. Background elements are smeared together and micro-details are inaudible.

Imaging E+

Poor instrument placement with unstable positioning. Instruments drift and lack fixed locations within the sound field.

Gaming D+

Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

Blon BL03 Reviews

Reviewed by: Super* Review

7* * score normalized

check links for more info:

Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

5.3 Reviewer Score

C- Tuning

C- Tech

Bland, but good tonal balance. Not terrible.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Mids: C+ Treble: C- Dynamics: C- Soundstage: B

Reviewed by: Crin

5 Reviewer Score

B Tuning

C Tech

Very pleasing and safe tuning with subpar technical detailing.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

4.6 Reviewer Score

C Tuning

C Tech

Comment: The only saving grace is the bearable tonality and bass for bassheads. Bass bloat with recessed, messy midrange

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: B- Mids: C- Treble: C- Soundstage: C Details: C Imaging: C+

Reviewed by: Precogvision

4 Reviewer Score

C- Tuning

D+ Tech

Pleasant, bassy, warm tonality marred by subpar resolution.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel

Bass: C- Mids: C+ Treble: C- Dynamics: C- Details: C- Imaging: D

Reviewed by: Audionotions

3 Reviewer Score

Abysmal fit and I couldn't actually listen to them without having to press them into my ears to seal. I'm sure they sound fine. YMMV. Previously Owned

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

Reviewed by: Nymz

2.7 Reviewer Score

D- Tuning

D- Tech

Timbre benchmark. Fit is awful. Sounds a bit veiled and mids are below average for the price. Dethroned by Mele, even tho it has better timbre and treble extension. Remove the grill for better sound.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: D Mids: D Treble: E+ Details: E+ Imaging: D

QKZ x HBB Khan Reviews

Reviewed by: Tim Tuned

5.5 Reviewer Score

B- Tuning

A- Tech

Very well tuned, strong clean bass treble can use more eveness

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel

Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: B

Reviewed by: Jays Audio

4 Reviewer Score

B+ Tuning

C+ Tech

Same as the Crin Zero but with slightl more bass and less faitguing, although at the cost of more recessed vocals/mids. Mid-bass tuck affects libraries.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel