TANGZU Waner VS KZ EDX Pro

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

TANGZU Waner and KZ EDX Pro are in-ear monitors. TANGZU Waner costs $25 while KZ EDX Pro costs $15. TANGZU Waner is $10 more expensive. TANGZU Waner holds a clear 0.6-point edge in reviewer scores (5.2 vs 4.6). TANGZU Waner has significantly better mids with a 2-point edge, TANGZU Waner has significantly better treble with a 1-point edge and KZ EDX Pro has significantly better dynamics with a 2-point edge.

Insights

Metric TANGZU Waner KZ EDX Pro
Bass 5.2 4
Mids 5 3
Treble 4 3
Details 5.2 3
Soundstage 6 4.6
Imaging 5.2 3
Dynamics 2 4
Tonality 5.9 3.3
Technicalities 4.3 3.3

TANGZU Waner Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss
Gizaudio Axel

Average Reviewer Score:

5.2

Mixed to Negative


KZ EDX Pro Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

4.6

Generally Unfavorable


Reviews Comparison

TANGZU Waner (more reviews)

TANGZU Waner reviewed by Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 5.5 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
C Tech

TANGZU Waner reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 4.8 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C- Tech
I just bought and reevaluated, such a bad experience.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: C- Dynamics: E+ Soundstage: B

KZ EDX Pro (more reviews)

KZ EDX Pro reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 6* * score normalized

KZ EDX Pro reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 3.2 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
D Tech
Surprisingly extended treble and good bass dynamics for the price. Just crappy tuning per usual.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C- Mids: D Treble: D Dynamics: C- Details: D Imaging: D

TANGZU Waner User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

KZ EDX Pro User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

TANGZU Waner Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.7

Gaming Grade

C

KZ EDX Pro Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.3

Gaming Grade

D

TANGZU Waner Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Dynamics E+
Limited dynamic range with poor micro-detail. Subtle volume changes are lost, and transients lack proper attack.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

KZ EDX Pro Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

D
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass C-
Subdued bass response that stays mostly in the background. Lacks energy and impact but maintains basic definition.
Mids D
Midrange is significantly uneven with coloration. Some frequencies are boosted while others are missing, creating an unnatural tone.
Treble D
Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.
Dynamics C-
Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.
Details D
Modest detail presentation with significant loss of texture. Nuances are masked and complex passages become congested.
Imaging D
Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning. Lacks precision for center placement and suffers from positional blurring.
Gaming D
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

TANGZU Waner User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

KZ EDX Pro User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Buy

Footer