Tangzu Yu Xuan Ji VS KZ PRX
IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side
Tangzu Yu Xuan Ji and KZ PRX are in-ear monitors. Tangzu Yu Xuan Ji costs $50 while KZ PRX costs $55. KZ PRX is $5 more expensive. Tangzu Yu Xuan Ji holds a decisive 1.2-point edge in reviewer scores (4.7 vs 3.5). KZ PRX carries a user score of 8.5. KZ PRX has significantly better mids with a 2-point edge, Tangzu Yu Xuan Ji has significantly better treble with a 1-point edge and Tangzu Yu Xuan Ji has significantly better dynamics with a 2-point edge.
Insights
| Metric | Tangzu Yu Xuan Ji | KZ PRX |
|---|---|---|
| Mids | 3 | 5 |
| Treble | 2 | 1 |
| Soundstage | 5 | 5 |
| Dynamics | 4 | 2 |
| Tonality | 5.4 | 3.5 |
| Technicalities | 4.3 | 1 |
Tangzu Yu Xuan Ji Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
KZ PRX Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
Tangzu Yu Xuan Ji Details
Driver Configuration: n/a
Tuning Type: n/a
Brand: TangZu Top TangZu IEMs
Price (Msrp): $50
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
KZ PRX Details
Driver Configuration:
Tuning Type: n/a
Brand: KZ Top KZ IEMs
Price (Msrp): $55
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Tangzu Yu Xuan Ji User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
KZ PRX User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score:
Based on 1 user reviews
8.5Excellent
Tangzu Yu Xuan Ji Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.6Gaming Grade
CKZ PRX Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
1.8Gaming Grade
ETangzu Yu Xuan Ji Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C+- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
C-- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
KZ PRX Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
D+- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
E-- Noticeably blurred or congested. Struggles with basic instrument separation; details are lost in simple tracks. Feels "flat" and one-dimensional.
Tangzu Yu Xuan Ji Reviews
5.5
Reviewer Score
Airy treble/staging. Clean balanced sound. Good tech. 8-10K Peak isn't as big as graph suggests. Jays Audio Youtube Channel
3.8
Reviewer Score
interesting iem, but bad and forgetable. Jaytiss Youtube Channel
KZ PRX Reviews
3.5
Reviewer Score
Weird upper trebble is killing it for me, but it might be good for you. Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Tangzu Yu Xuan Ji User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewKZ PRX User Reviews
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewHarman Warm Tuning.